What type of consequence might a therapist provide for an incorrect response?

Providing redirection or an informational "No" as a consequence for an incorrect response serves a crucial role in guiding behavior and learning. When a therapist utilizes redirection or an informational "No," they are effectively helping the individual understand that the response given was not appropriate or correct in that context. This approach can clarify expectations and reinforce the idea that the individual should try a different response.

Redirection allows the therapist to shift the individual’s focus back to the task at hand or redirect them towards a more appropriate behavior or response. Meanwhile, an informational "No" gives clear feedback about what was incorrect, which helps the individual learn and adjust their behavior for future attempts. This technique is essential in therapeutic settings, especially for those on the autism spectrum, as it promotes understanding of the task and encourages adaptive learning strategies without overwhelming the individual.

In contrast, other types of responses like reinforcement apply to correct behaviors, while cueing or prompting involves additional support to encourage the correct action rather than addressing incorrect responses. Encouragement for the next attempt, while positive, does not address the mistake made in the current answer and may not provide the necessary information for improvement in the immediate situation.