What type of language is recommended when discussing ASD?

The recommendation for using child-centered or person-first language when discussing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) emphasizes the importance of recognizing the individual first, rather than defining them solely by their diagnosis. This approach promotes respect and dignity, acknowledging the person as unique, with their own strengths and challenges beyond the label of autism.

Referring to individuals as someone with ASD—rather than labeling them as "an autistic person"—reflects an understanding that their condition does not define their entire identity. Additionally, using expressions like "typically developing" offers a comparative perspective that can be constructive, but it is essential that such comparisons do not reinforce stereotypes or imply that those with ASD are less valuable. This language fosters a more inclusive environment and encourages acceptance, which is fundamental in both caring for and advocating for individuals with ASD.

This perspective contrasts sharply with other options that suggest the use of technical jargon, casual language, or strict medical terminology. These alternatives may either alienate or diminish the complexity of the experience of individuals with ASD and their families. By adopting child-centered and person-first language, practitioners and advocates can create a more supportive dialogue that enhances understanding and acceptance.